Margaret Sanger – Atheist, Socialist, Liberal, Racist, Adulterer, Advocate of Eugenics & Forced Sterilization, Demoness of Death
This is the person Hillary Clinton admires. Hillary has even accepted the Margaret Sanger Award presented to her by Planned Parenthood. Clinton has not only bought into Sanger’s political views regarding class warfare, but seeks to emulate Sanger’s philosophical vision of creating a master race.
Why any Democrat, especially a person of color, would even remotely consider Clinton as becoming our next president is beyond me. It is time to wake up and smell the coffee!
In 1903 Sanger gave birth to the first of three children she bore with her husband. Later acknowledging that she had neglected those youngsters—one of whom died of pneumonia at age four—Sanger declared that she was not a “fit person for love or home or children or anything which needs attention or consideration.” Anecdotes abound of her inattention to the physical and emotional needs of her children. On one occasion, for example, her son Stuart walked twenty miles along the Cape Cod beach on a hot day to greet his mother at a train station, only to discover that she had never boarded the train and had failed to notify him that she would not be coming. Most egregious, perhaps, was Sanger’s snap decision in 1914 to abscond to Europe in order to avoid criminal charges, leaving behind a young daughter who was very ill. She never even said “Good-Bye” to any of them.
Sanger was no more considerate of her marital vows than she was of her parental responsibilities. As author Daniel Flynn writes: “She was a serial adulterer. Among the scores who shared her bed were some of the most famous men of her time, including novelist H. G. Wells and sex researcher Havelock Ellis. As she cheated on her husband of the moment with not-so-secret lovers, she cheated on these paramours with still other beaus. These encounters, biographer Ellen Chesler suggests, were limited neither to members of the opposite sex nor to two participants.” Sanger eventually separated from her husband in 1914.
The Clinton’s are as lacking in morals as was Sanger. Years ago stories surfaced from Arkansas State Troopers about the sex parties about the Governor’s Mansion when Bill Clinton was governor of that state. His character as an adulterer has been revealed time and time again. Because of Hillary’s participation in past love trysts it came as no surprise she defended her husband against the accusations and berated the women who were abused by Bill. Finally, when the lies could no longer be contained both Hillary and Bill acknowledged the infidelity.
Sanger joined the Women’s Committee of the New York Socialist Party and the Liberal Club, and she participated in a number of strikes led by the Industrial Workers of the World union. Author Jonah Goldberg writes that Sanger “fell in with the transatlantic bohemian avant-garde of the burgeoning fascist moment.”
In 1912 Sanger began writing a women’s-rights column for the New York Call entitled “What Every Girl Should Know,” whose themes centered around the importance of contraception. In this column, Sanger once wrote the following about population groups she considered to be intellectually inferior: “In all fish and reptiles where there is no great brain development, there is also no conscious sexual control. The lower down in the scale of human development we go the less sexual control we find. It is said that the aboriginal Australian, the lowest known species of the human family, just a step higher than the chimpanzee in brain development, has so little sexual control that police authority alone prevents him from obtaining sexual satisfaction on the streets.”
This low regard for certain groups formed the foundation of what would become Sanger’s lifelong devotion to the goal of purifying society by means of birth control, sterilization, and eugenics.
Sanger coined the term “birth control” to describe efforts to prevent, as much as possible, the reproduction of “subnormal” human beings who were “less fit” than others, physically or psychologically. Among her many noteworthy quotes on the subject were the following:
Upon the publication of Stoddard’s book, Sanger invited the author to join the board of directors of the American Birth Control League (ABCL), which Sanger founded in 1921 and headed, as its president, until 1928. Many years later, ABCL would evolve into the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the largest abortion provider in the United States.
Sanger’s commitment to eugenic “sexual science” dovetailed seamlessly with her Marxist vision. While she had been heartened by the success of the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, she doubted that a revolution for a new communist order in the U.S. could be carried out by a proletariat class of limited intellectual capacity. Thus she sought to elevate the quality of the overall gene pool by means of eugenics. “In pointing out the limitations and fallacies of the orthodox Marxian opinion,” Sanger wrote in The Pivot of Civilization, “my purpose is not to depreciate the efforts of Socialists aiming to create a new society, but rather to emphasize what seems to me to be the greatest and most neglected truth of our day: unless sexual science is incorporated … and the pivotal importance of birth control is recognized in any program of reconstruction, all efforts to create a new world and a new civilization are foredoomed to failure.”
A new world order? A new civilization? That is exactly the goal of the Clinton’s and the radical leftists running the Democratic Party. Their new world with its improved racial qualities will be a white majority and a “birth controlled” population of non-whites. In that new world order, the elitist white class will rule and persons of color will live to serve them.
Sanger played a major role in pushing states to enforce compulsory sterilization laws, which became a common practice in the U.S. for some time. More than 60,000 Americans were sterilized against their will during the first half of the 20th century when Sanger and the birth-control and population-control movements were zealous in their efforts to see the proliferation of eugenics.
Sanger, like most politicians, spoke from two faces. From one face she stated, “I bring up the subject here only because some ill-informed persons have the notion that when we speak of birth control we include abortion as a method. We certainly do not.” Yet, out of the other face Sanger was directing her employees at birth-control clinics to refer pregnant women to underground abortionists. Sanger even raised money so that these women would not have to pay for the procedure.
Sanger never abandoned her communist and socialist ideals. Between 1928 and 1948, she repeatedly voted for socialist presidential candidates, including Eugene Debs in 1920 and the Socialist Party of America’s Norman Thomas several times thereafter. The last years of Sanger’s life were filled with unhappiness. Feeling abandoned and ignored by her former comrades, she became an alcoholic and developed an addiction to the painkiller Demerol.
Over the years and even during the current election campaign, many black ministers and black politicians have attempted to deflect the racist values of Margaret Sanger. Why? Considering that they vote by tradition and not by ethical or moral standards, they have to defend Sanger because Hillary admires her. Take a moment to read the following except from Sanger’s autobiography.
“Always to me any aroused group was a good group, and therefore I accepted an invitation to talk to the women’s branch of the Ku Klux Klan at Silver Lake, New Jersey, one of the weirdest experiences I had in lecturing.”
“My letter of instruction told me what train to take, to walk from the station two blocks straight ahead, then two to the left. I would see a sedan parked in front of a restaurant. If I wished I could have ten minutes for a cup of coffee or bite to eat, because no supper would be served later.”
“I obeyed orders implicitly, walked the blocks, saw the car, found the restaurant, went in and ordered some cocoa, stayed my allotted ten minutes, then approached the car hesitatingly and spoke to the driver. I received no reply. She might have been totally deaf as far as I was concerned. Mustering up my courage, I climbed in the back and settled back. Without a turn of the head, a smile, or a word to let me know I was right, she stepped on the self-starter. For fifteen minutes we wound around the streets. It must have been towards six in the afternoon. We took this lonely lane and that through the woods, and an hour later pulled up in a vacant space near a body of water beside a large, unpainted, barnish building.”
“My driver got out, talked with several other women, then said to me severely, “Wait here. We will come for you.” She disappeared. More cars buzzed up the dusty road into the parking place. Occasionally men dropped wives who walked hurriedly and silently within. This went on mystically until night closed down and I was alone in the dark. A few gleams came through chinks in the window curtains. Even though it was May, I grew chillier and chillier.”
“After three hours I was summoned at last and entered a bright corridor filled with wraps. As someone came out of the hall I saw through the door dim figures parading with banners and illuminated crosses. I waited another twenty minutes. It was warmer and I did not mind so much. Eventually the lights were switched on, the audience seated itself, and I was escorted to the platform, was introduced, and began to speak.”
“Never before had I looked into a sea of faces like these. I was sure that if I uttered one word, such as abortion, outside the usual vocabulary of these women they would go off into hysteria. And so my address that night had to be in the most elementary terms, as though I were trying to make children understand.”
“In the end, through simple illustrations I believed I had accomplished my purpose. A dozen invitations to speak to similar groups were proffered. The conversation went on and on, and when we were finally through it was too late to return to New York. Under a curfew law everything in Silver Lake shut at nine o’clock. I could not even send a telegram to let my family know whether I had been thrown in the river or was being held incommunicado. It was nearly one before I reached Trenton, and I spent the night in a hotel.” Pages 366-67 Margaret Sanger’s autobiography 1938
Sanger’s own words demonstrate that she knew that this was an extreme group. She clearly is intimidated by the cloak and dagger mystic. In fact, note Sanger’s comment about letting her family know that she had not been thrown into the river. Obviously, Sanger understood that this was a rather violent group. What gave her that hint? Was it the illuminated crosses? Was it the KKK’s history of lynching black people?
Her words offering no signs of regret or remorse in speaking to this group; in fact, Sanger said, “…I believed I had accomplished my purpose. A dozen invitations to speak to similar groups were proffered.”
Imagine if a conservative GOP candidate spoke to a KKK group and then during an interview with the New York Times said, “Always to me any aroused group was a good group, and therefore I accepted an invitation to talk to the women’s branch of the Ku Klux Klan…” If that were to happen leftist Democrats and CNN would have a field day with such a statement. Yet, Margaret Sanger as a liberal Socialist/Democrat and one of Hillary Clinton’s favorite public figures, get a pass from black ministers and black politicians.
The question has to asked, “Why is Hillary Clinton so supportive of Margaret Sanger?” Even though Martin Luther King Jr.’s niece Alveda King, the website BlackGenocide.org, numerous black pastors and a host of other African-Americans have called for the removal of Sanger’s bust from the Smithsonian.
Without a doubt, Sanger had a negative view of non-whites that would diminish the purity of the white race. “What material is there for a greater American race? What elements make up our present millions? Where do they live? How do they live? In what direction does our national civilization bend their ideals? What is the effect of the “melting pot” upon the foreigner, once he begins to “melt”? Are we now producing a freer, juster, more intelligent, more idealistic, creative people out of the varied ingredients here?”
“Before we can answer these questions, we must consider briefly the races which have contributed to American population.”
“Among our more than 100,000,000 population are Negroes, Indians, Chinese and other colored people to the number of 11,000,000. There are also 14,500,000 persons of foreign birth. Besides these there are 14,000,000 children of foreign-born parents and 6,500,000 persons whose fathers or mothers were born on foreign soil, making a total of 46,000,000 people of foreign stock. Fifty per cent of our population is of the native white strain.”
“Moreover, there were in the United States in 1910, 5,516,163 illiterates. Of these 1,378,884 were of pure native white stock. In some states in the South as much as 29 per cent of the population is illiterate, many of these, of course, being Negroes.”
“The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.” Woman of the New Race by Margaret Sanger
I am not black or brown, but there have been many times I wished I had not been white either. One thing I do know is that if I were a person of color, Hillary Clinton, the admirer of Margaret Sanger, would be a detriment to me and to future generations of every person of color.